X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 1 Sep 2006 03:21:54 -0700
From:	clayne AT anodized DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin fork()
Message-ID:	<20060901102154.GB7444@ns1.anodized.com>
References:	<20060901100138 DOT GA7444 AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com> <00b801c6cdaf$343b9a10$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<00b801c6cdaf$343b9a10$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
X-Assp-Spam-Prob:	0.00000
X-Assp-Whitelisted:	Yes
X-Assp-Envelope-From:	clayne AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com
X-Assp-Intended-For:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 11:12:59AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> > Is it just me or is cygwin fork(), or a support syscall underneath,
> > terribly slow for some reason? 
> 
>   Some reason == "lack of O/S support".

Yes I can understand that. I'm assuming there is some CreateProcess()
magic happening behind the scenes. However, what I've noticed is that it
is WAY slower than one would think it to be.

-cl

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -