Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/08/29/17:00:18
Hi Dave,
I tried this; it's an excellent point but isn't the problem. I
experimented using your script version and $? is indeed set to 0 when
the backtick output is empty.
I'd be happy to hear more suggestions. I also need to try this on
another machine (my home box, perhaps) to see if it's reproducible on
other machines. Have you tried any of these scripts to see if it's a
problem general to Cygwin users?
Regards,
Russell
________________________________________
On 29 August 2006 17:04, Silva, Russell wrote:
> The value of $? is always 0 when this problem occurs, even if it
should
> be a non-zero value. For instance:
>
> <bug_reproduce3.sh>
> #!/bin/bash
> # make 1000 attempts to reproduce the bug
> for i in `seq 1 1000`
> do
> # ls should return incorrect usage = error code 2
> x=$(ls -j 2>&1);
> # if the bug has occurred
> if [[ $x == "" ]]
> then
> # this outputs 0, but "incorrect usage" ls should (and does)
return
> 2
> echo $?
> fi
> done
> When the bug occurs, causing $x to be empty, the value of $? is 0 when
> it should be 2.
Are you sure you aren't testing the return value of the 'if' or perhaps
the'[[' command there? What happens if you rewrite it as:
#!/bin/bash
# make 1000 attempts to reproduce the bug
for i in `seq 1 1000`
do
# ls should return incorrect usage = error code 2
x=$(ls -j 2>&1); y=$?
# if the bug has occurred
if [[ $x == "" ]]
then
echo $y
fi
done
cheers,
DaveK
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -