X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:10:46 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81
Message-ID:	<20060817151046.GI17328@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20060814213115 DOT 093f2a40 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0608142225030 DOT 13215 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <20060815031725 DOT GB18949 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060815083334 DOT 07ab5470 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <20060815210221 DOT GB4783 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060816092323 DOT 0b449ad0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <E1GDdID-0001Dt-F9 AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org> <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060817090639 DOT 0a662c40 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <20060817144927 DOT GG17328 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060817105707 DOT 0a66f6d0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<6.2.3.4.2.20060817105707.0a66f6d0@pop.nycap.rr.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:00:48AM -0400, William A. Hoffman wrote:
>At 10:49 AM 8/17/2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I've already mentioned once that this was the wrong mailing list for
>>this.  Why do you seem to need everything repeated at you?
>>
>>If you, or anyone, is having problems with MinGW's make it would
>>behoove you to discuss the problems in a mailing list which was
>>populated by people who are familiar with it.
>
>Because I do not agree with your suggestion.  Apparently you need
>things repeated to you.  So, here is my reason for the post again.  You
>mentioned MinGW as an alternative, it does not work.  Also, someone on
>this list asked me a question, and I answered it.

Again, you don't know if it works since you just tried it, saw a
problem, and reported it here without asking for clarification on the
mingw list.  I just checked and see no email from you over there.

I made this point in the original message.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -