X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:12:30 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Igor Peshansky <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
cc:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject:	Re: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.63.0608170950440.14156@access1.cims.nyu.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.63.0608171010080.14156@access1.cims.nyu.edu>
References:	<6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060815151104 DOT 0b40e260 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <01b901c6c116$21259430$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060816091525 DOT 0ab90af0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <20060816144110 DOT GX20467 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060816111421 DOT 0b446b60 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <20060816155054 DOT GY20467 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0608161418370 DOT 9095 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060816144036 DOT 09695af0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0608161543520 DOT 14156 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <E1GDdoK-0002Ml-Re AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0608170950440 DOT 14156 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> > >
> > > Alternatively, you can try to implement a $(cygpath ...) function in
> > > make and submit *that* to the upstream maintainers.
> >
> > FWIW, I don't think such a function is a good idea, and if it is
> > proposed on the Make mailing list, I will probably object to it.
> >
> > The reason is that adding such a function goes against portability of
> > Makefiles across different ports of Make,
>
> ...which you would already have with cl commands and DOS paths...

Actually, sorry, I've misread the above.  Doesn't GNU make already have a
plethora of functions not present in other makes?  What's wrong with one
more?  If "cygpath" is too system-specific a name, let's pick one that
isn't ("pathconv"?).
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_	    pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu | igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		old name: Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -