delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | RE: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81 |
Date: | Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:03:47 -0400 |
Message-ID: | <467C77F6373BDE4BB16A3E8A62C0395567A111@Exchserv.hatteras.com> |
From: | "Brian Hassink" <bhassink AT hatterasnetworks DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id k7GF3wdn023590 |
Respectfully, Doesn't this just push the maintenance effort elsewhere? Suppose the upstream maintainer has "no fun" either? There are obviously a lot of users in the cygwin community using this feature of cygwin make and would like to see it continue to be supported. Why can't a new maintainer step forward to do so? If the interests of the current maintainer diverge from those of the larger community, then perhaps it's time for the maintainer to consider stepping aside? Again, I'm saying/asking this respectfully. -Brian -----Original Message----- From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 10:41 AM To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81 > - have the patch made part of the upstream gnu make That's the best solutiion of all. The whole "problem" is that the current Cygwin make maintainer has no fun to work on this issue. Everybody else is free to put a bit of time and sweat into this and get this for free firther on. I'm still wondering why people don't go this way instead of discussing this problem, which is none, IMHO, to death. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |