delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
A recap, as I understand it (please correct me if I'm wrong): * The version of GNU Make for Cygwin used to support MS-DOS filenames. This feature was not part of GNU Make if you compiled the sources for Cygwin out of the box, but was something that was added and maintained as a separate patch. * The maintainer of the GNU Make package grew weary of maintaining the patch and decided to drop it. * Lots of people are complaining. * The maintainer of the GNU Make package for Cygwin has repeatedly made it clear that no amount of complaining will result in the patch being maintained and applied to any future GNU Make package for Cygwin. My understanding is that the central problem is the amount of effort required to update the patch with each new release of GNU Make, not that the feature itself is necessarily bad, though there may be some obscure problems such that it would be better if the feature could be optional, either with a command-line option or special Makefile directive. * You are now taking this to mean that the Cygwin maintainers don't care about users and you are suggesting that this could result in a fork of Cygwin (good luck with that). Please, this makes absolutely no sense. This whole problem could be solved if the people who are complaining about the Cygwin version of GNU Make directed their efforts toward getting a patch accepted in the GNU Make sources that handles MS-DOS style filenames when GNU Make is compiled for Cygwin. Then there would be no need to maintain a separate patch just for the Cygwin package of GNU Make. Or am I missing something? jwe -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |