delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/08/14/18:17:53

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <44E0F683.3030203@netacquire.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:17:39 -0700
From: Joachim Achtzehnter <joachima AT netacquire DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81
References: <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060814153701 DOT 0b3cab80 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <C874DBE9D30B584587F8CD0EC34DA8BE024CF9F2 AT EX00 DOT idirect DOT net> <20060814213132 DOT GA31811 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <6 DOT 2 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 2 DOT 20060814174744 DOT 0b3d7a10 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <20060814215719 DOT GA32432 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20060814215719.GA32432@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave Korn wrote:

> Every single day for the past month, we have had at least
> seventy-four[*] identical duplicate redundant reports of this...

Have you considered that there just might be a significant message hidden 
in this from your user community? As somebody who was involved in one of 
these earlier threads, let me also mention that to every one of these 
seventy-four[*] reports you see on the mailing list there is another user 
who expresses his annoyance with these changes in private emails, having 
given up on posting such things because of the hostile reaction one gets 
these days for expressing views about requirements that certain people here 
don't like.

Christopher Faylor wrote:

> I just don't care about MS-DOS paths.

Fair enough, you've made that pretty clear in previous posts.

> If I am somehow conveying the impression that there is some threshold of
> affected users which will cause me to spend my own time trying to
> modify make, let me make it clear - that is not the case.

If this implies that Cygwin maintainers generally "just don't care" about
their users anymore perhaps those users will have to band together some day 
and consider creating a Cygwin fork...

Joachim


-- 
work:     joachima AT netacquire DOT com   (http://www.netacquire.com)
private:  joachim AT kraut DOT ca          (http://www.kraut.ca)

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019