Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/08/13/17:32:55
>From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
>If I don't miss anything, it remains to be explained why the OP didn't
>see problems with normal buffers. Could the OP please try visiting
>several large text files, then kill their buffers, invoke the
>`garbage-collect' function ("M-x garbage-collect RET"), and see if the
>memory footprint returns to its original value?
starting emacs -Q: 12,832k
editing a large test file (43,085,936), emacs memory goes up to 55,028k
killing : emacs uses 13,070
and M-x garbage-collect 13,100 or so,
so far it seems that tmemory is returned. however, using emacs a bit more,
opening and killing buffers, eventually does lead to memory increase even
after I kill all buffers and do garbage-collect.
>A few more tests come to mind:
>
> . Put a breakpoint in sbrk and in mmap, and find out which one is
> being called when normal text files and image files (both small
> and large) are visited.
could you please write which .c files and which routines should I be looking
at slightly more specifically? thanks...
> . Visit many small image files (smaller than 256K) and see whether
> the memory is being returned to the OS.
>
>I'd like to ask the OP to try these and report the results.
_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -