delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Chris Croughton <chris AT keristor DOT net> |
Subject: | Is anyone packaging gcal? |
Date: | Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:19:17 +0100 |
Lines: | 13 |
Message-ID: | <slrnedsadl.b6r.chris@ccserver.keris.net> |
Reply-To: | chris AT keristor DOT net |
User-Agent: | slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
I had a look on the packages search for gcal (the GNU calendar program) and it doesn't seem to be there (it wasn't in the setup.exe list, so I searched in case it was included in another package). It does build "out of the box" using gcc, so this wasn't a great hardship, but I was wondering whether anyone is thinking of packaging it and if not whether there would be any interest if I packaged it (since it doesn't need any patches it seems fairly simple to do, and as it's GPL the licence wouldn't be a problem). I looked at the web pages on packaging, but didn't see anything which said how you become a packager or maintainer or whether you need authorisation to upload a package, have I missed something? Chris C -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |