X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<44DCFF7C.5000406@tlinx.org>
Date:	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:06:52 -0700
From:	Linda Walsh <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	group "name" for numberic value 2**32-1?
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I ran into a weird "symptom" -- not a bug in anything as near
as I can tell, just a weirdness.

Everyone once in a while, when I do an "ls -l" on some groups
of files, I'll see a "group" of ??????.  With "ls -ln", I see
the group has a value "4294967295".  Would it be misleading
or incorrect to insert an entry in /etc/group (maybe in mkgroup)
mapping that value to "nogroup"?

If we insert such things "manually", would it be useful if
"mkgroup" (and maybe mkpasswd) had some option to "merge"
non-conflicting entries into their output, or would that
undesirable for some reason?

-linda


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -