delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/08/11/15:14:54

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:14:27 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Breach of GPL?
Message-ID: <20060811191427.GA32661@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <c09652430608110446u2f28139dk85ca261f72e89474 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20060811175415 DOT GC7503 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <c09652430608111120s3b48ccd3ve76a1f7171328c8b AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c09652430608111120s3b48ccd3ve76a1f7171328c8b@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:20:39PM +0200, ?yvind Harboe wrote:
>On 8/11/06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:46:57PM +0200, ?yvind Harboe wrote:
>>>- They have some partial old version of Cygwin with Nios 5.0/6.0.  This
>>>causes havoc because Cygwin (sadly) does not support side-by-side
>>>installs.
>>
>>And, happily, it does not need to.  Just use the latest version of
>>Cygwin.  For what you are describing, you only need one Cygwin
>>installation on your system.
>
>Your position on this issue is famous. :-)

It's a little more than a position.  However, I won't go into the litany
of reasons why it's a bad idea (just like having multiple copies of
kernel32.dll or user32.dll is a bad idea*) since no one ever wants to
talk about those.

>Personally, I disagree. It think Cygwin should allow side-by-side installs.

Usually, people who think this is necessary are coming from a situation
where they haven't really thought about things too much but it just
seems to them like there should be no good reason why they can't have
multiple copies of the Cygwin DLL whereever they feel like putting them
since that seems to be what is most convenient.  Unfortunately, having a
strong desire for something without evincing a clear understanding of
the ramifications and tradeoffs doesn't translate into a strong
position for bringing about change.

I'm saying this not as a criticism of your one sentence above, since you
obviously aren't arguing for anything, just stating an opinion.
However, often, when this issue is raised, there are people who come out
of the woodwork to forcefully express their desires in long email
treatises which are big on "it seems to me" but short on technical
understanding.

FWIW it seems to *me* that situations like what has been foisted on you
by Altera couldn't be considered to be good for anyone.

cgf

*Sorry.  That was just one example, not a litany.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019