X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Where can I find old Cygwin repositories?
Date:	Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:25:25 +0100
Message-ID:	<00b401c6bd38$d798ee60$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<c09652430608110408h5277ece2l8b1790497e422a1b@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id k7BBPinu005040

On 11 August 2006 12:09, Øyvind Harboe wrote:

> I need to compile a nios2 GCC toolchain which is compatible with the
> Cygwin that Altera included in the Nios 5.0/6.0 product.
> 
> Does anyone know where I can find a coherent snapshot of a Cygwin
> repository as far back as  2003('ish)?

  Google for the "Cygwin Time Machine".

> My problem is that the __getreent() entry does not exist in that old
> Cygwin installation that Altera in their wisdom included in Nios
> 5.0/6.0. I don't know if this is the *only* problem or whether other
> incompatibilities where introduced at the same time.
> 
> The Cygwin that comes with Nios 5.0/6.0 is not complete enough to
> build a GCC toolchain.

  Surely the better option would be to crosscompile your toolchain against
up-to-date cygwin?  The generated object files should still be the same.

> Some more details on what I'm working on:
> 
> http://www.zylin.com/nios2libstdc++.html
> 
> The real solution to this problem involves twisting the arm of Altera
> not to include a version of Cygwin, IMHO.

  This whole thing starts to sound like they're in massive breach of the GPL,
isn't it?


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -