Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/08/03/13:08:18
On Aug 3 01:54, Eric Blake wrote:
> > >I'm really seeing the non-optimized cygwin cp behaviour causing bad
> > >reputation, which could be easily patched and maybe even accepted
> > >upstream. Who knows. Eric what do think? Would it be worthful to think
> > >about?
>
> I don't really want to maintain a Windows API patch, and doubt that
Good.
> it would be accepted upstream. Now if there were something more
> POSIX-y that we could do to speed things up, such as posix_fadvise,
posix_fadvise can't be implemented nicely, AFAICS. The POSIX semantics
require an already opened file and the advice is given for an offset and
a length. The Windows semantics only allow to give the advice for the
whole file, and only switching between FILE_SEQUENTIAL_ONLY or "normal",
using ZwSetInformationFile. By re-opening the file using ZwOpenFile it
would also be possible to toggle the FILE_RANDOM_ACCESS flag. Still,
it's always for the whole file, not for an area giving offset and length.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -