X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<44CFFDF6.9060002@cygwin.com>
Date:	Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:20:54 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20060112 Fedora/1.5-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.5.20(0.156/4/2) pipe hangs, dos files
References:	<20060801141450 DOT 88222 DOT qmail AT web51109 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20060801141450.88222.qmail@web51109.mail.yahoo.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Saurabh Tendulkar wrote:
> I guess I must send this again since no one replied the first time. 

<snip>

Actually, no.  If you don't receive a response with your first inquiry,
sending a copy of the first prefaced with an argument that you're repeating
your plea isn't the right approach.  It often leads to the opposite result
of what you want.

FWIW, I saw no problem when I tried your test case, though at the time, I
was working with an earlier version of 'coreutils' at the time.  I haven't
had a chance to update and rerun yet.


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -