delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/07/27/18:11:48

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:11:36 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: bug-make AT gnu DOT org, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 3.81 and windows paths
Message-ID: <20060727221136.GD6653@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: bug-make AT gnu DOT org, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, bug-make AT gnu DOT org
References: <20060727195042 DOT GC27890 AT brasko DOT net> <44C92033 DOT A2978A8E AT dessent DOT net> <17609 DOT 11132 DOT 462789 DOT 443104 AT lemming DOT engeast DOT baynetworks DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <17609.11132.462789.443104@lemming.engeast.baynetworks.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 05:09:16PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
>In fact, I'm wondering if there is an advantage to building GNU make
>using the Cygwin environment, vs. using a native MingW (for example)
>build of GNU make?  I'm afraid I'm woefully ignorant about the details.

There is no advantage using cygwin if you want to use a Makefile which
contains MS-DOS paths.  Using MinGW makes perfect sense in that case.
Despite having suggested this repeatedly, it seems some users are still
not clear on this concept.

If you want to use a Makefile which works in a Cygwin environment,
however, then obviously you need to build it with a Cygwin gcc.

I'm *very* sorry that I didn't make it clearer in my release
announcement that the change in behavior for cygwin was due to a
decision on my part not to try to forward port some old make patches
which I have always found questionable.  Of course hardly anyone reads
release announcemnts, but that would mean that at least some people
wouldn't think of this as some sort of generic make bug.  It never
occurred to me that anyone would be complaining about this in the
bug-make mailing list.

Again, I'm sorry for any confusion this may have caused.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019