delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <44C671C1.4C168B94@dessent.net> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:32:17 -0700 |
From: | Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Why does tcl84.dll not follow the Cygwin DLL naming convention? |
References: | <ea5j4l$and$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Shankar Unni wrote: > This just a casual question: why? I know, WJM and all that, but why > don't these libraries have a "cyg" prefix - which would solve all these > problems? I think it's because tcl/tk is one of the few packages that is actually compiled as a windows native program. However running cygcheck on the dlls shows that they seem to still be linked against cygwin1.dll so it's clear my understanding is a little bit off here. There was a long thread on the -apps list at one time about the state of these packages, and the various flavors that it could take, i.e. MSVCRT/Cygwin and GDI/X11. But no one actually stepped forward to do anything about this and take over the packaging, and cgf has said repeatedly the only reason they are there is to support insight and other than that working he has no real desire to mess with them. The fact that insight comes with (or maybe "requires" is a better word) its own bundled copy of tcl/tk is a separate issue I think -- ideally it would use the installed copy on the system and not depend on its own, which I think would simplify this situation greatly. Then we could package tcl/tk more freely, offering the various flavors. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |