delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | mwoehlke <mwoehlke AT tibco DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Where is complex.h |
Date: | Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:28:52 -0500 |
Lines: | 34 |
Message-ID: | <ea3l3k$hu0$1@sea.gmane.org> |
References: | <20060724203648 DOT 74182 DOT qmail AT web56301 DOT mail DOT re3 DOT yahoo DOT com> <44C534F5 DOT 8070107 AT cygwin DOT com> <20060724211014 DOT GB25632 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) |
In-Reply-To: | <20060724211014.GB25632@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:00:37PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >> TV JOE wrote: >>> I've a C program referencing complex.h. But make can't find it and the >>> only copy I see is in /usr/include/mingw which I don't think is the >>> right version. Advice welcomed. >> Try: >> <http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=complex.h> >> >> That will tell you what packages have complex.h in them. I expect you >> can reasonably narrow down from there the package you need and how to >> get at the file you want. > > I don't think that there is any cygwin package which provides a usable > complex.h is there? I don't see one from the above list and, if one was > going to exist, it should come from newlib -- which doesn't seem to be > the case. I did find these: (cygwin-1.5.21-1) cygwin-1.5.21-1/newlib/libc/sys/linux/include/complex.h (gcc-g++-3.4.4-2) usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/include/c++/backward/complex.h usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/include/c++/complex Now that I noticed the third one, the second one makes sense; it is probably a wrapper complaining that you should '#include <complex>'. However those are C++ headers, not C headers. The first one does have "newlib" in the path, for whatever that's worth. -- Matthew Warning: This message has not been approved by the FDA. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |