X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	mwoehlke <mwoehlke AT tibco DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Where is complex.h
Date:	Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:00:55 -0500
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<ea3ce7$ijm$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<20060724203648 DOT 74182 DOT qmail AT web56301 DOT mail DOT re3 DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)
In-Reply-To:	<20060724203648.74182.qmail@web56301.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

TV JOE wrote:
>  I've a C program referencing complex.h. But make can't find it 
>  and the only copy I see is in /usr/include/mingw which I don't
>  think is the right version.  Advice welcomed.

No, probably not...

http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=/complex.h suggests 
there is one in the Cygwin core source, and one in 'backward' in the GCC 
package, which sounds suspicious (as in, implies that this header is 
deprecated?). I'm just guessing. At any rate, the above link clearly 
shows you a full path where one might/should be located, though it 
doesn't indicate if the "complex.h" is the one you're looking for.

-- 
Matthew
Warning: This message has not been approved by the FDA.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -