X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:55:23 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.5.21s mmap error
Message-ID:	<20060714155523.GL8759@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0607121030410 DOT 3792 AT PC1163-8460-XP DOT flightsafety DOT com> <20060712165900 DOT GQ8759 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0607121318080 DOT 2284 AT PC1163-8460-XP DOT flightsafety DOT com> <20060712202215 DOT GS8759 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0607121536330 DOT 3784 AT PC1163-8460-XP DOT flightsafety DOT com> <20060713103431 DOT GA17383 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0607130933400 DOT 1164 AT PC1163-8460-XP DOT flightsafety DOT com> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0607131315110 DOT 3316 AT PC1163-8460-XP DOT flightsafety DOT com> <20060714091601 DOT GD8759 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0607140931050 DOT 3316 AT PC1163-8460-XP DOT flightsafety DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.CYG.4.58.0607140931050.3316@PC1163-8460-XP.flightsafety.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2i
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jul 14 09:42, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > I'm not sure we really want to do that, certainly not for 1.5.21.  If
> > you need this sort of functionality, switch off MAP_NORESERVE.
> 
> Sure, I know how to work around it.
> 
> I just wanted to point out that MAP_NORESERVE is somewhat broken.  I'd bet
> there are other applications that will be caught by this bug.  Shouldn't
> we just disable it until it works well enough for the application to at
> least not know we aren't quite compliant?

Compliance is a problem with a non-standard feature...

No, I will not switch it off.  It's working at least for the case it
was intended for.  If you want to switch off all features which don't
exactly work like some other OS, you could switch off half of Cygwin,
I guess.  The idea is to have features working for most cases and then
to get it working gradually better.

And last but not least, http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#SHTDI and
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PTC.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -