X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:05:21 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 1.5.21 release imminent - please test latest snapshot
Message-ID:	<20060714140521.GB3349@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0606211151520 DOT 24426 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0607141208570 DOT 5764-100000 AT ax0rm1 DOT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.OSF.4.21.0607141208570.5764-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:16:12PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>> Well, Monday.  Isn't that explicit enough?  Do you also need the year?
>
>
>The original post (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00188.html) was
>dated 20060707.
>
>Perhaps it would be sufficient a 1.5.20-2 that fix this
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00145.html.

Or, maybe you could just assume that if cygwin wasn't released there might
be a reason?  Did you see any actual testing of the snapshot, for instance?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -