delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/07/13/13:22:04

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <c788d79a0607131021ga017d9fw5ff0ab5b8d6f6bf8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:21:51 -0400
From: "Aslam Karachiwala" <akwala AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: make (v. 3.81) fails -- "target pattern contains no `%'"
In-Reply-To: <04bc01c6a675$93f74c80$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20060713004641 DOT GA13699 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <04bc01c6a675$93f74c80$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Thanks, guys. I'll try this when I get a chance to reinstall 3.81, and
report back. At the moment I''ve reverted to 3.80, and have a deadline
approaching...you know how it is :)

On 7/13/06, Dave Korn <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com> wrote:
> On 13 July 2006 01:47, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:32:04PM -0700, Jim Lawson wrote:
> >>>> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:15:27 -0400
> >>> From: "Aslam Karachiwala" <akwala AT gmail>
>
> >>>  The error -- target pattern contains no `%' --
> >>> occurs at a target
> >>> such as the following:
> >>>
> >>> releaseproducts  :: $(RELEASEDIR)/$(BINIMAGE)
> >>
> >> I think you'll find that this is due to the dropping of support for
> >> Windows paths in the new (3.81) version of make.  I suspect
> >> $(RELEASEDIR) has a ':' in it somewhere.
> >>
> >> Try something like this:
> >>
> >> RELEASEDIR:=$(shell cygpath -u $(RELEASEDIR))
> >
> > That is an inspired guess which never would have occurred to me.  I'll
> > bet you're right, though.  That may even become a FAQ at some point.
> >
> > If this isn't the case then we'll (obviously?) need to see more of
> > the makefile than the one failing line.
>
>
>   It's absolutely the case, I had the exact same problem myself when I built
> (re)make from source without the cygwin-specific patches.
>
>   In my case I fixed it by porting the diffs from the cygwin make-3.80 source
> package.  (I have users who require a mixed-mode make environment).
>
>
>
>     cheers,
>       DaveK
> --
> Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>


-- 
Aslam Karachiwala
http://www.mythicflow.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019