X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Mark Hadfield <m DOT hadfield AT niwa DOT co DOT nz>
Subject:	Pthread.h issue
Date:	Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:39:23 +1200
Lines:	45
Message-ID:	<44B4289B.1040105@niwa.co.nz>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Cc:	Uwe Schulzweida <Uwe DOT Schulzweida AT zmaw DOT de>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I am trying to build version 1.0.0 of the CDO (Climate Data Operators) 
package:

   http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/fileadmin/software/cdo/
   http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/fileadmin/software/cdo/cdo-1.0.0.tar.gz

There is a problem with the pthread-related code. The problem can be 
worked around, but it seems to indicate a problem with some of the macro 
definitions in Cygwin's pthread.h.

To cut a long story short, the CDO source includes the following (file 
src/pthread_debug.c, function  print_pthread_mutexattr, lines 84-87):

#if defined (PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT)
   pthread_mutexattr_getprotocol(m_attr, &protocol);
   POUT3(caller, protocol, PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT, PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT, 
PTHREAD_PRIO_NONE);
#endif

This expands to valid C code if and only if the macros 
PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT, PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT and PTHREAD_PRIO_NONE are 
defined to integer constants. But the definitions are empty 
(/usr/sys/sinclude/pthread.h, lines 63-65):

#define PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT
#define PTHREAD_PRIO_NONE
#define PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT

My work-around (apparently successful but the resulting executables have 
not been tested thoroughly) is to override the above with

#define PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT 1
#define PTHREAD_PRIO_NONE 1
#define PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT 1

So, why would Cygwin pthread have empty definitions for these macros? Is 
it safe to override the definitions? Would it be safer to omit the code 
that uses them on this platform?


-- 
Mark Hadfield          "Kei puwaha te tai nei, Hoea tahi tatou"
m DOT hadfield AT niwa DOT co DOT nz
National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -