X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Sun, 9 Jul 2006 23:02:51 -0700
From:	Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna AT efn DOT org>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: FW: Cygwin Perl bug -- pod2usage(-verbose => 0) & pod2usage(-verbose => 1)
Message-ID:	<20060710060251.GB2932@efn.org>
References:	<41ECDED5 DOT 2060300 AT x-ray DOT at> <001b01c6a3b0$5e276710$0a10a8c0 AT holgerdanske DOT local>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<001b01c6a3b0$5e276710$0a10a8c0@holgerdanske.local>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 04:35:29PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> Cygwin & Perl:
> 
> This issue is still present.
> 
> 
> Reini's PERLIO suggestion functions as a work-around on Cygwin.
> 
> 
> Who decides if/when to use Reini's suggested patch?  If that decision
> has already been made in the negative, why and what is the next step?
> If that decision has already be made in the positive, when will we see
> the correction in Cygwin?

I'm building an updated perl package, and will include this patch
and try to get it included upstream.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -