X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:59:44 -0700
From:	clayne AT anodized DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	change in 20060704 snap
Message-ID:	<20060707015943.GA7409@ns1.anodized.com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
X-Assp-Spam-Prob:	0.00000
X-Assp-Whitelisted:	Yes
X-Assp-Envelope-From:	clayne AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

-/* undocumented in wsock32.dll */
-extern "C" unsigned int WINAPI inet_network (const char *);
-
 extern "C" unsigned int
 cygwin_inet_network (const char *cp)
@@ -157,7 +152,5 @@ cygwin_inet_network (const char *cp)
   if (efault.faulted (EFAULT))
     return INADDR_NONE;
-  unsigned int res = inet_network (cp);
-
-  return res;
+  return ntohl (inet_addr (cp));
 }

Won't this be returning a full host address rather than a network address
now?

If need be, I could contribute by writing cygwin-native versions of
inet_pton, inet_ntop, inet_aton, inet_ntoa, etc. rather than calling the
windows variants. inet_addr on it's own is already pretty bitrotted at
this point as well.

-cl

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -