X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:10:47 -0700
From:	Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna AT efn DOT org>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ?
Message-ID:	<20060704061046.GA2924@efn.org>
References:	<44A474CE DOT 7090100 AT netbauds DOT net> <20060630011818 DOT GD2154 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <e86j6c$u5o$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <20060701202808 DOT GD19376 AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20060701202808.GD19376@ns1.anodized.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:28:08PM -0700, clayne AT anodized DOT com wrote:
> And of course the discussion and methodology behind the internal
> development of the cygwin libraries, issues, and future ideas is
> - in true opensource form (NOT) - on a completely closed list,
> invite-only, with no public access to any form of archives.

Where do you get invite-only from?  Seems directly contradicted by
what you go on to quote.
 
> What exactly is the positive purpose behind that?
> 
> "cygwin-developers: a by-approval developers list for discussing
> the internals of the Cygwin DLL and all components of the
> "winsup" directory. Discussions of upcoming net releases are also
> appropriate. Subscription requests are handled on a case-by-case
> basis. Only subscribers may submit email to this list. Please do not
> attempt to join the cygwin-developers mailing list unless 1) you are
> thoroughly familiar with the cygwin DLL, 2) you have successfully built
> the DLL from source, 3) you contributed at least one patch to the Cygwin
> DLL or its utilities, and 4) you intend on being a long-term contributor.
> Please do not ask for "read-only" access to this mailing list. You either
> qualify or you don't. There is no middle ground."

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -