delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <44A474CE.7090100@netbauds.net> |
Date: | Fri, 30 Jun 2006 01:48:14 +0100 |
From: | Darryl Miles <darryl-mailinglists AT netbauds DOT net> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060614 SeaMonkey/1.0.2 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Which list should cygwin development be discussed on ? |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
There is this list, which seems general purpose. Enough said. There is cygwin-patches, which claims to be for patch submissions but looking at the recent history is actually an open developers list. There is cygwin-developers, which is a closed list. Is my more technical discussion better put onto the cygwin-patches list ? I'm not looking at becoming a "long-term developer" here. I'm just here to scratch an itch and then go back to other open source projects in which I do have a long term developer interest. Darryl -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |