X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<001201c6945d$59ca3010$0a3b6080@joehome>
From:	"Science Guy" <sciguy AT comcast DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	snapshots: first resort, or last resort?
Date:	Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:33:22 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

In http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-06/msg00434.html, Brian said "using the
latest snapshot should always be the first thing you try when encountering a
problem before reporting it to the list."

However, the instructions for installing snapshots at
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.snapshots say:  "First,
are you sure you want to do this? Snapshots are risky. They have not been
tested. Use them ONLY if there is a feature or bugfix that you need to try,
and you are willing to deal with any problems, or at the request of a Cygwin
developer."

For a non-expert, such as me, this dichotomy of views is perplexing.  This
is made all the more perplexing because there does not seem to be (I could
not find) a user-readable list of bugs that each snapshot fixes vis-a-vis
the latest release.  So how would a user know whether the "risky" step of
installing a snapshot will have any chance of fixing a particular bug?

-- Joe


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -