X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:49:00 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sourceware DOT org
Subject:	Re: Reading a write-only file doesn't set error condition (was Re: Cygwin fread on Write-Only File Descriptor returns undefined state)
Message-ID:	<20060614164900.GW16683@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sourceware DOT org
References:	<448F9EA1 DOT 7050908 AT tlinx DOT org> <20060614082441 DOT GA6326 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4490370B DOT 7080609 AT tlinx DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4490370B.7080609@tlinx.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2i
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jun 14 09:19, Linda Walsh wrote:
>   Er, are you referring to the case of zero possibly being
> a valid return value if the program requests zero bytes be read?
> I didn't say "only 0"...  I new about the other values<count,
> but was focusing on the conditions that would exist only when
> a 0 was returned for the return value.

Nope, sorry, I just got you wrong.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -