X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<448AB51E.1070809@pacific.net.sg>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:03:42 +0800
From:	Erich Dollansky <oceanare AT pacific DOT net DOT sg>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Why is Cygwin1.dll monolithic?
References:	<448A9EB0 DOT 4050404 AT sh DOT cvut DOT cz>
In-Reply-To:	<448A9EB0.4050404@sh.cvut.cz>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id k5AC4O7d016250

Hi,

Václav Haisman wrote:
> Today I woke up and one of the first things that came on my mind was
> this: Why isn't Cygwin1.dll devided to the "kernel" and separate C library?

isn't it just the API?

So why should there be a 'kernel'?

Erich


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -