X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<448A9EB0.4050404@sh.cvut.cz>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:28:00 +0200
From:	=?UTF-8?B?VsOhY2xhdiBIYWlzbWFu?= <V DOT Haisman AT sh DOT cvut DOT cz>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Why is Cygwin1.dll monolithic?
OpenPGP:	id=733031B4
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--------------enig7409F3A8DD2BAD5678AB7B44
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Today I woke up and one of the first things that came on my mind was
this: Why isn't Cygwin1.dll devided to the "kernel" and separate C library?

--
Vaclav Haisman

PS: I am not trying to suggest anything or to troll, I am merely curious.


--------------enig7409F3A8DD2BAD5678AB7B44
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEVAwUBRIqetm56zbtzMDG0AQJQXwgAohJC3B1Q/8YTmoZ9pVEVALuZEeqBZQgd
3tMwg00HsIpyVxFX90O/vzNqemeKDJZfafEsZ9oidLpglXXfwKc9+hOmTjdIkMVq
ClR2NVHfeLUopkGOLZ+Tn9addSTonA5U3VDEbtAJJ5L6F5h4dPEjtcoyS9DjZOZE
x7o6A7GceMSIVIbFoXfzQGDwiDFypXk6p/BVxO6hbbD8pU7TARqVFjhLsGShJIcE
tcfx5JrObCbzBfOSayDBOKfv+gTDpoJxR2LmThDmSS1SGDg72e2SXiIfYtH1gGFF
jYAqsncsgzVdyrwQViftAEtXtSZfGqjjULuJ6yIzeQUdVGugneeRzg==
=7Qjz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig7409F3A8DD2BAD5678AB7B44--

- Raw text -