X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 29 May 2006 11:38:18 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: simple test triggers fork errs for me in 5/27 snapshot
Message-ID:	<20060529153818.GB12157@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<022d01c6830f$61ca8c10$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <023801c68320$50831d80$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<023801c68320$50831d80$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>Anyone got any good ideas?

I've rescanned this thread to reacquaint myself with why I was
semi-ignoring it and I've found that the data points are 1) it fails
with 4/27 and one subsequent snapshots 2) it works with the 4/3
snapshot 3) it fails with the 3/9 snapshot.

I was hoping that somebody besides me would offer the obvious
observation that if this truly stopped working at some point, then
knowing when it stopped working with less granularity than a 24 day
period would be the first step towards fixing the problem.

So, that's my good idea.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -