X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 23 May 2006 01:04:15 -0700
From:	clayne AT anodized DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: "Please don't discuss other, competing products here"
Message-ID:	<20060523080414.GF13907@ns1.anodized.com>
References:	<20060522140033 DOT GA17013 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <005d01c67e0b$4b22a6e0$1e10a8c0 AT holgerdanske DOT local>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<005d01c67e0b$4b22a6e0$1e10a8c0@holgerdanske.local>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
X-Assp-Spam-Prob:	0.00000
X-Assp-Whitelisted:	Yes
X-Assp-Envelope-From:	clayne AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:50:38PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> 3.  Last but not least, the open-source software (OSS) movement used to
>     have at its core the concept of "Freedom", including "Freedom of
>     Speech".  OSS projects were simply assumed by the OSS community to
>     allow freedom of speech (within reason); those that did not invited
>     protest and/or rejection.
> 
> David

I too, do not see the issue with discussing 'competing' products here. What's
the issue?

-cl

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -