X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<446CA289.5030403@zib.de>
Date:	Thu, 18 May 2006 18:36:25 +0200
From:	Andreas Loebel <loebel AT zib DOT de>
Reply-To:	loebel AT zib DOT de
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060404 SeaMonkey/1.0.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	ssh (protocol 2) crash on brand new T2600 dual core cpu (Dell Latitude D620)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi all,

I observed a ssh (protocol 2) crash (using cvs, rsync, scp, unison, 
etc.) only on my brand new T2600 dual core cpu whenever the load on the 
ssh tunnel raises.

I have also noticed a thread about "scp timeout on dual-core processor", 
which sounds very similar, but provides no solution.

The only information I can provide is a ssh.exe.stackdump:

Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=00F449B9
eax=00000015 ebx=002298AC ecx=2F54534E edx=00229778 esi=7C809BF5 
edi=2F54534E
ebp=00229674 esp=002287F8 program=C:\cygwin\bin\ssh.exe, pid 4888, 
thread main
cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003B gs=0000 ss=0023
Stack trace:
Frame     Function  Args
00229674  00F449B9  (00000000, 00229668, 610FD4BC, 0022FBB8)
End of stack trace

However, using the insecure protocol 1 works. But this is only some 
workaround that I do not really want to use and that might not be 
available on many servers.

Any ideas?

Andreas

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -