X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: [Patch] patch -Z not working if timestamp contains seconds >=59.5
Date:	Wed, 17 May 2006 10:37:15 +0100
Message-ID:	<018101c67995$7be0b5d0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<446A37B7.10504@t-online.de>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id k4H9ewrS011032

On 16 May 2006 21:36, Christian Franke wrote:

> René Berber wrote:
>>> Is there a more appropriate place to report patch bugs?
>>> 
>> 
>> No, that address is the one listed (even if patch now is part of
>> diffutils), see: 
>> 
>>   http://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/manual/html_node/Bugs.html#Bugs
>> 
> 
> Page comment is "This manual is for GNU Diffutils (version 2.8.1, 5
> April 2002)"
> and HTTP last modified date is November, 6th 2003.
> 
> So this info is possibly no longer valid.
> 
> Christian


  We've been through all this before.  Diffutils moved to savannah, didn't it?
Perhaps there's a more active ML listed there?


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -