X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	ericblake AT comcast DOT net (Eric Blake)
To:	Christian Franke <Christian DOT Franke AT t-online DOT de>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [Patch] patch -Z not working if timestamp contains seconds >=59.5
Date:	Tue, 16 May 2006 20:31:42 +0000
Message-Id:	<051620062031.21802.446A36AE0006DDC10000552A22007348300A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net>
X-Mailer:	AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Apr 11 2006)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> > Would you mind to discuss this on bug-patch AT gnu DOT org?  As far
> > as my opinion counts, I'd think that aligning its behaviour with tar
> > would be a good thing.  But the core developers might have an entirely
> > different opinion...
> >   
> 
> bug-patch is not listed at http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/.
> Sending the report direct to bug-patch AT gnu DOT org, I've seen no 
> observable
> difference to /dev/null ;-)
> 
> Is there a more appropriate place to report patch bugs?

When in doubt, enough people read bug-gnu-utils to help out,
even if there is a dedicated list for that project.  Also, patch is
now maintained as part of diffutils, and according to
http://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/, bug-gnu-utils in
this case happens to be the list where diffutils issues are
currently discussed.

-- 
Eric Blake

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -