Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/05/10/21:56:34
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:38:58AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:30:50PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> >On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:50:59PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:47:09AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:11:57PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> >> > >On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 08:12:42PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> > >> Please test the latest snapshot (at least 2006-Apr-24) from
> >> > >>
> >> > >> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Please report back in this thread when you encounter a problem, which
> >> > >> you can't reproduce with 1.5.18 or 1.5.19. We're interested in
> >> > >> regressions in the first place.
> >> > >
> >> > >I'm having problems with rsync'ing perl seeming to hang that didn't
> >> > >happen with 1.5.18/9 or snapshots up to 20060329. I'll try to post
> >> > >cygcheck output soon.
> >> >
> >> > Corinna changed ssh recently. Are you using the new version?
> >>
> >> No, not using ssh at all. Just:
> >>
> >> rsync --delete -avz public.activestate.com::perl-current perl
> >>
> >> cygcheck attached (after backing down to 20060329).
> >
> >I was mistaken. It is working in 20060403 and hangs in 20060412 and
> >every snapshot afterward.
>
> Would you be willing to try building a cygwin DLL with Corinna's
>
> 2006-04-04 Corinna Vinschen <corinna AT vinschen DOT de>
>
> * net.cc (fdsock): Raise default SO_RCVBUF/SO_SNDBUF buffer sizes to
> the same values as on Linux.
>
> change reverted and see if that changes things?
>
> That's the only thing in the 20060412 that I can see which would make a
> difference.
Yes, that looked like a possibility to me too. I'll try it tonight or
tomorrow night.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -