delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | laurent lemaitre <r29173 AT freescale DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: valgrind |
Date: | Tue, 9 May 2006 13:04:12 +0000 (UTC) |
Lines: | 24 |
Message-ID: | <loom.20060509T150137-607@post.gmane.org> |
References: | <OE59oGdKO8FNpyLAPDV00000293 AT hotmail DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Gareth Pearce <tilps <at> hotmail.com> writes: > > Hi, > > Has anyone atempted to port valgrind to cygwin? > I thought it was something that would be good to do, but its looking like > quite a big job, given that its tied so strongly to the linux kernel. I > could keep ripping it to bits until it compiles - but I am guessing the end > product will be useless. > Is it feasible at all given cygwin not actually being an OS? -- would i > really effectively need to port it to native windows? > > Gareth > > Gareth, I tried to compile it without success (using cygwin). Do you know if there is someone who successfully did the porting? Thanks, Laurent -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |