X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4457F5AC.5000904@ucsd.edu>
Date:	Tue, 02 May 2006 17:13:32 -0700
From:	Steven Brown <swbrown AT ucsd DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060421)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Angelo Graziosi <Angelo DOT Graziosi AT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Fixing the state of C++ in Cygwin
References:	<Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0605021559490 DOT 11646-100000 AT ax0rm1 DOT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.OSF.4.21.0605021559490.11646-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Angelo Graziosi wrote:

> Your test case (http://svn.variadic.org/public/trunk/weirdbug/) DOES NOT
> abort also if one rebuilds GCC WITHOUT ADDING
> --enable-fully-dynamic-string BUT APPLYING the patch PR24196!

Yes, that's all in the bug report, but why I'd avoid it is that they
were still undecided if that was the form of the patch they'd use on the
trunk.  I don't like relying on unfinished patches - best take the known
route until that work is finished.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -