X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 1 May 2006 22:03:49 +0200 (MET DST)
From:	Angelo Graziosi <Angelo DOT Graziosi AT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Fixing the state of C++ in Cygwin
Message-ID:	<Pine.OSF.4.21.0605012153040.25930-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Steven Brown wrote:

> Does rOOt disable explicit instantiation via tweaking
> _GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE?

I cannot answer this. I am only an user of ROOT (http://root.cern.ch/), 
not a developer.

I know only that it is almost an year that the build made with GCC-3.4.4
do not work.

After applying the PR24196 patch to basic_string.h and basic_string.tcc,
rebuilding ROOT, it works!

The same happens if one builds GCC-3.4.4 configuring it with
--enable-fully-dynamic-string and rebuilds ROOT.



Cheers,

   Angelo.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -