X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	"'Lloyd Wood'" <L DOT Wood AT surrey DOT ac DOT uk>
Cc:	"'Chris Elliott'" <cl3ellio AT interchange DOT ubc DOT ca>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>,
	<geomview-users AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net>,
	<geomview-devel AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net>
Subject:	RE: Geomview & Cygwin setup
Date:	Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:17:35 +0100
Message-ID:	<008c01c66ace$7efa54e0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<7.0.1.0.0.20060428143849.0598ed78@surrey.ac.uk>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 28 April 2006 15:04, Lloyd Wood wrote:

[most of what I want to say is in the response I just sent before I just
received this reply, so I'm only going to reiterate one single *very*
important point].

> Clearer, and backwardly compatible, would be a gcc version report of
> something like:
> gcc version 3.4.4 (cygwin special) (MinGW, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125)

> Saying 'ming' instead of 'MinGW' is a deliberately misleading
> distraction.

  No, it's a linguistic constuct called a "contraction".  You saw "cyg"
without the "win" and didn't complain about that.

>  I was deliberately misinformed by gcc -v.

  No, you misinformed yourself by your false assumptions about the nature of
gcc -v.

> __CYGWIN__ is defined for gcc; gcc -v should report 'cygwin special'.
> I do not recommend changing the environment to __CYGMING__ to match
> in a further attempt at humour.
> 
> If you want people to use the information you provide rationally, do
> not colour that information with irrational attempts at humour to
> provide misinformation that causes doubt.
> 
> We need to trust the output of gcc -v.

  No, this is completely wrong and absolutely not what you want to do.  The
output of "gcc -v" is a human-readable summary of various internal information
which can be obtained by more reliable means for programmatic use.  Your
attempt to indirectly deduce the same info from a freeform text string
presupposes many assumptions that simply do not hold, and therefore is doomed
to incorrectness.


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -