Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/04/27/14:14:19
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:04:50PM +0200, Peter Keitler wrote:
>corinna wrote:
>>On Apr 27 11:21, Peter Keitler wrote:
>>I did and I could reproduce it. Thanks for the testcase. The fix I
>>applied looks certainly wierd, but it works for me. Would you mind to
>>give the next snapshot a try which should be available in a couple of
>>minutes?
>
>Looks good, the new snapshot works for me. Thanks for the patch :-) What
>was the reason? Race-condition or something like that?
>Have a nice day, I will leave the office now...
Best guess is that it is still this problem:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2004-q3/msg00079.html
(see subsequent discussion for why this wasn't a real solution)
which, AFAIK, remains as a problem today.
The latest snapshot just increases the size of a pipe buffer. So, it
isn't a real fix, just a workaround. There is still a problem lurking
there but fixing it isn't trivial.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -