delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/04/25/18:53:39

X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <444EA84C.1020109@cygwin.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:53:00 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051223 Fedora/1.5-0.2.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Call for testing Cygwin snapshot
References: <20060425134320 DOT fb30e530d17747c2b054d625b8945d88 DOT 6a269b6ea8 DOT wbe AT email DOT secureserver DOT net> <055e01c668ad$b32316d0$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20060425212732 DOT GE18840 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20060425212732.GE18840@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:17:47PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 25 April 2006 21:43, Jerry D. Hedden wrote:
>>
>>> Ernie Coskrey wrote:
>>>> it's possible that Jerry has found a scenario that causes this problem to
>>>> occur. Maybe not, but if he can reproduce it it would be worth checking.
>>> I can reproduce the problem.  That's not the issue.  I cannot provide a
>>> little test app to produce the problem at will.
>>  Since nobody else is reporting this problem, it seems pretty unlikely that
>> anyone else is going to be able to do it for you.
>>
>>> As for the patch, that's useless - I'm not going to try to learn how to
>>> build the Cygwin DLL.
>>  In that case the P clearly EBKAC.
>>
>>>   However, if anyone can suggest some other
>>> simple, non-labor-intensive method for gathering more data on this
>>> problem, I'd be willing to give it a try.
>>  Sounds like your best bet is to sit there and do nothing.  Yep, that's it.
>> Thats's *bound* to get the bug fixed.  Why, surely sooner or later someone
>> else will have the same bug and fix it for you?  All you have to do is just
>> sit there and wait.  If you get bored watching the tumbleweed roll past, you
>> could always read
>>
>> http://cygwin.com/faq/faq.programming.html#faq.programming.building-cygwin
>>
>> to pass the time.
> 
> While I generally agree with the sentiment, in this case, I don't think
> it would be productive to attempt a build of the DLL until I've verified
> that I can't reproduce the problem with the supplied scripts.
> 
> And, I really don't think it's a good idea to start supposing reasons
> for the hang yet unless someone wants to actually look at the
> differences between the snapshots and propose a theory based on the
> that.
>

I looked at the differences and I think the problem is due to one of
them.  Yep, no doubt about it.  There's got to be a change in there
that's the cause of this problem.

HTH,

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

PS ;-)

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019