Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/04/21/11:08:22
On Apr 21 16:58, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Lars Munch, le Fri 21 Apr 2006 16:48:31 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 04:32:37PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > That's a problem with the code you're working on. If it relies on the
> > > fact that int32_t resp. uint32_t are typedef'ed as "int", then it
> > > contradicts the purpose of stdint.h, which is, not relying on the
> > > definition of underlying datatypes.
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation and you are absolutely right, but isn't using
> > long instead of int a potential problem, since long is usually 64bit on
> > a 64bit system whereas int is usually 32 bit and both 32bit and 64bit
> > systems?
>
> When 64bits will be supported, there will be an ifdef here.
It's that simple :-)
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -