delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:25:09 +0200 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | htonl, htons, ntohl and ntohs types |
Message-ID: | <20060421092508.GA15855@tuxedo.skovlyporten.dk> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
From: | lars AT segv DOT dk (Lars Munch) |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Hello I have noticed that the types of the functions htonl, htons, ntohs and ntohl differs from standard (and linux): http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/htonl.html Cygwin uses: unsigned long int ntohl(unsigned long int); unsigned short int ntohs(unsigned short int); unsigned long int htonl(unsigned long int); unsigned short int htons(unsigned short int); The standard (and Linux) has: uint32_t htonl(uint32_t hostlong); uint16_t htons(uint16_t hostshort); uint32_t ntohl(uint32_t netlong); uint16_t ntohs(uint16_t netshort); Is there any reason for this difference? The difference in the api gives me warnings when porting code from Linux to Cygwin. Thanks Lars Munch -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |