X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:58:25 -0500
From:	mwoehlke <mwoehlke-nospam AT tibco DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Cygwin and Interix interoperability?
In-reply-to:	<20060420170449.GA24155@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-to:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id:	<4447CBC1.3030000@tibco.com>
MIME-version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201)
References:	<4447BE05 DOT 6070103 AT tibco DOT com> <20060420170449 DOT GA24155 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:59:49AM -0500, mwoehlke wrote:
>> Are there any plans of making Cygwin more compatible with Interix
 >> (and especially the (and especially the SFU/SUA NFS clients)?
> 
> No, there are no plans.  I can't speak for Corinna, but, personally, I
> have no interest in this.  That does not preclude someone offering patches
> but I think that's pretty unlikely, too.

IOW, "DIY"?

When you say "pretty unlikely", do you mean 'that anyone else would 
provide patches', or that such patches would be used?

-- 
Matthew
"Ethics? We've heard of it" -- Microsoft

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -