X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:30:27 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	Cygwin MailList <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: malloc different for XP and 2000?
Message-ID:	<20060331093027.GE24357@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin MailList <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<442CF159 DOT 8090508 AT osc-es DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<442CF159.8090508@osc-es.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.2i
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mar 31 11:07, Jens Wilken wrote:
> Does cygwin use different strategies or limits on Win2K and WinXP?

No, but Win2K uses different strategies than XP.  Somewhere in MSDN is
an article about changes in memory allocation between Windows versions,
afair.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -