Mail Archives: cygwin/2006/03/16/14:38:07
2006/3/14, Brett Serkez <bserkez AT gmail DOT com>:
> <snip>
> > I'm running sshd without the -r option all the time and I can't observer
> > the high CPU load as reported. What's different on your system?!?
>
> I *believe* this primarily happens on Windows2000. I wasn't able to
> track down. The problem is that once the system gets in this state,
> with 100% CPU it is virtually unusable, the primary goal is to
> shutdown the daemon to get the system back for the primary user.
>
> This became such a problem that I finally ended up turning of the sshd
> daemon on all my Win2K systems and live without it, which was made
> possible by the introduction of systems running Fedora which I could
> use for secure access to the subnet.
>
> I haven't tried the latest release, I am due for maintenance with the
> impending Microsoft patch releases today, I'll turn it back on for
> some of the systems and see if I can reproduce.
>
> My general sense is that it has/had some thing to do with process
> creation and signal handling, perhaps a missed signal?!?!?
I have the same problem in W2K starting with at least with two cygwin
services, where one cygrunsrv.exe after some days goes up to 99%.
Killing the cygrunsrv.exe process alone is enough, which did
not affect the actual service, which runs fine even with the killed
service controller.
With one cygwin service alone I had no problem so far.
Regardless which service, if it's sshd, cron or cygserver.
No problem on the XP boxes.
--
Reini
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -