X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:11:39 +0100
From:	Samuel Thibault <samuel DOT thibault AT ens-lyon DOT org>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: pthread_create leaves valid mutex pointers on the stack
Message-ID:	<20060316171139.GM4280@implementation.labri.fr>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<17433 DOT 39495 DOT 950903 DOT 287320 AT metro-north DOT cs DOT columbia DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<17433.39495.950903.287320@metro-north.cs.columbia.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.11
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi,

Jonathan Lennox, le Thu 16 Mar 2006 12:03:03 -0500, a écrit :
Content-Description: message body text
> In general, the idea of verifying objects on their init functions seems
> dubious to me -- how can you tell initialized objects from random stack or
> heap garbage?

Posix says:
    Attempting to initialize an already initialized mutex results in undefined
    behavior.

But the behavior you desribe is weird indeed :)

Regards,
Samuel

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -