X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<44187B91.3070801@usa.net>
Date:	Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:39:45 -0600
From:	Paul Mattes <paul DOT mattes AT usa DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Memory leak in vsnprintf
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I believe I have found a memory leak in the Cygwin version of 
vsnprintf().  If it is called with a NULL 'str' parameter and a 0 
'length', it leaks a BUFSIZ-sized buffer.  (Per C99 and SUSv3, calling 
vsnprintf() with a NULL 'str' and 0 'length' is a way to find out how 
big the formatted string would be without actually storing it anywhere.)

I see that Cygwin's vsnprintf() comes from newlib.  Should I report this 
to them instead?

Here is an example program:

    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <stdarg.h>

    int
    waste_it(char *fmt, ...)
    {
            int ns;
            va_list a;

            va_start(a, fmt);
            ns = vsnprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, a);
            va_end(a);
            return ns;
    }

    main(int argc, char *argv[])
    {
            int i;
            int n;

            for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
                    n += waste_it("%s foo %d", "hello", 49);
            }
    }

This program will consume quite a lot of memory on Cygwin.

-- 
        pdm


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -