delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <a5f030530603140621o158ec92aq7a21f7e6476fbe0@mail.gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:21:27 -0500 |
From: | "Brett Serkez" <bserkez AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: cygrunsrv.exe Processor Util 100% on Windows Server |
In-Reply-To: | <20060314141212.GE5887@calimero.vinschen.de> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
References: | <loom DOT 20060313T154128-550 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <a5f030530603130711k3f047e4chbc9c071cda17c87f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <loom DOT 20060314T044531-404 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <a5f030530603140607p77bd7df9he0831529a907f6cb AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20060314141212 DOT GE5887 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id k2EELZ4I025781 |
Corinna, <snip> > I'm running sshd without the -r option all the time and I can't observer > the high CPU load as reported. What's different on your system?!? I *believe* this primarily happens on Windows2000. I wasn't able to track down. The problem is that once the system gets in this state, with 100% CPU it is virtually unusable, the primary goal is to shutdown the daemon to get the system back for the primary user. This became such a problem that I finally ended up turning of the sshd daemon on all my Win2K systems and live without it, which was made possible by the introduction of systems running Fedora which I could use for secure access to the subnet. I haven't tried the latest release, I am due for maintenance with the impending Microsoft patch releases today, I'll turn it back on for some of the systems and see if I can reproduce. My general sense is that it has/had some thing to do with process creation and signal handling, perhaps a missed signal?!?!? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |